Excellent
90%–100%
80%–89%
70%–79%
0%–69%
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population.
The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied.
The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The presentation defines the considered population.
The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied.
The response includes a description of the author’s claims.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population.
The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described.
The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims.
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing.
The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing.
The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing.
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout
Excellent
90%–100% |
Good
80%–89% |
Fair
70%–79% |
Poor
0%–69% |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders. •Provide an overview of the article you selected, including: What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration? What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used? What were the author’s claims? |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims. |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The presentation defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a description of the author’s claims. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims. |
0 (0%) – 13 (13%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing. |
o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why? |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing. |
• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation incl
Struggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free! |